College Media Network

Author Ruffles Feathers with Nov. 13 Lecture

Liz Gnau | The News Record

Print this article

Published: Sunday, November 16, 2008

Updated: Monday, November 24, 2008

Darwish

Coulter Loeb | The News Record

Members of the University of Cincinnati Muslim Students Association and the Campus Anti-War Network protested author Nonie Darwish's visit to campus Thursday, Nov. 13.

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

When author and journalist Nonie Darwish came to the University of Cincinnati Thursday, Nov. 13, everyone in attendance seemed to be up in arms with members of the Campus Anti-War Network and the Muslim Students Association protesting Darwish’s presentation.

Darwish, who grew up in Egypt and Gaza, was invited to speak on campus by several Jewish organizations: The David Project, Zionist Organization of America, Stand With Us and Chabad House.

The seminar, Finding The Peace Within: A Story of Courage, A Challenge of Conviction, featured Darwish, who described her experiences growing up in the Middle East during the Arab-Israeli Wars (between 1948 and 1982).

“As an American woman of Arab and Muslim decent ... I treasure my freedom of speech that America has given me – a freedom that is too scarce in the Middle East,” Darwish said. “No religion or ideology should be beyond question. Ideologies or religions become stagnant and become a burden on their believers ... and nonbelievers [alike].”

Darwish emphasized the importance of religious self-regulation, to prevent fanatics such as Muslim jihadists or Christian Klu Klux Klan members from hijacking a religion.

“Every religion should monitor its own people,” Darwish said. “[Muslims] cannot sit and just try to educate Americans how to understand Islam ... they are sending us row after row after row of terrorists to kill themselves for some silly causes.

“Terrorism is not just hurting the Americans and the Jews and the children,” Darwish said. “With [every act of terrorism, terrorists] ... are destroying the goodness that I know exists in my culture.”

Darwish was quick to explain she doesn't place the blame with practitioners of Islam, but rather with what she feels is a broken system.

“I am not here to offend the good and peace-loving Muslims,” Darwish said. “I'm talking about an ideology ... that stands in the way of peace. There are mechanisms in the Middle East that stand in the way of peace.”

Darwish explained what she feels are problems with governments in the Arab world, governments which propagate and instill intolerant views.

“Most Arab countries are [dictatorships],” Darwish said. “Sharia Islamic law prohibits the separation of church and state ... the Muslim Khalifa must be obey, even if he is unjust ... It is a dictator's dream.”

In a series of lectures to the University of Southern California Muslim Student Association, Gharm Allah Al-Ghamdy defined the term “Khalifa” as literally “one who replaces someone else who left or died,” but in the religious context, the Muslim Khalifa is “the successor (in a line of successors) to Prophet Muhammad's position as the political, military and administrative leader of the Muslims” - or the head of the government of the Muslim state.

Sharia is “the most fundamental body of Islamic canonical laws derived from four sources: the Quran, the Sunnah (customs, everyday habits and religious practices of the Prophet Muhammad), the hadith or ahadith (recorded actions and teachings of the Prophet not found in the Quran) and the ijim or 'universal agreement' within the Muslim community that defines what the Quran and the Sunnah mean,” according to middleeast.about.com.

Sharia was codified in the 8th and 9th centuries.

“Sharia does not measure up to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948,” Darwish said. “Human rights are sacred and more divine than scriptures. It is not human rights that must pass the litmus test of religion. It is religion that must pass the litmus test of human rights. Human rights are not negotiable, even in the name of Allah.”

Darwish called for all religions to strive harder to promote peace.

“It's time for my culture of origin ... to speak out if we want to be credible, if we want to live in peace,” Darwish said. “Peace is a responsibility from every side, responsibility for every ideology and religion.”

After Darwish's lecture, Gila Naveh, a literature professor in the departments of Judaic studies and women's studies, said she believes the opportunity is ripe to offer an academic discourse to expound upon the religious tensions rife in the audience.

“I think this is a wonderful opportunity to start an interdisciplinary course,” Naveh said.
Naveh called the seminar “a golden opportunity” to implement UC President Nancy Zimpher's goal of making the university as “student-centered” as possible.

“Those students who stick around are ready ... for more education,” Naveh said. “[Students from] all walks of life are here, and we need to offer a course or a series of courses [for them].”

Nick Israel, campus coordinator for Zionist Organization of America, said he was pleased with Darwish's presentation.

“It's never popular to stand up for the minority rights in the Middle East,” Israel said, “But as a minority, I feel good to know there are women like Nonie Darwish fighting [for human rights].”

While few students seemed willing to speak to The News Record, debate both at Darwish's lecture and on Facebook has been heated.

Check out the opinion page in Wednesday's edition of The News Record for students' comments on Nonie Darwish and her lecture, Finding the Peace Within. You can also check out an audio slideshow of the event online at newsrecord.org.

Comments

23 comments
To Debbie
Mon Nov 24 2008 14:47
I'm very surprised by your comment, and I can only assume it reflects your own opinion which you are entitled to. However, let me ask you this:
- What benefit are Jewish organizations getting when they liberate the Muslim world from radicals? did the Zionist already hijack Palestine and attempted to hijack parts of Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon?
- When Nonie Darwish says: "It is the duty of Muslims to kill Jews according to the Muslim scripture. There are Muslim scriptures that tell u that if you are a Muslim you must kill Jews and if you do not, then you are violating the scriptures." Isn't that considered absurd and hateful?
- Do I need to go attend a lecture by Hitler to know what he will say?
- The Arabs cannot be anit-Semitism since the definition of the word includes Arabs and Hebrews alike.

For your last paragraph, my only comment is this:
youtube . com/watch?v=0meAT6i3iNQ (take out the spaces)

or maybe this is what u r talking about: youtube . com/watch?v=DaiUE-wkE4U (take out the spaces)

To Debbie
Mon Nov 24 2008 13:48
I'm very surprised by your comment, and I can only assume it reflects your own opinion which you are entitled to. However, let me ask you this:
- What benefit are Jewish organizations getting when they liberate the Muslim world from radicals? did the Zionist already hijack Palestine and attempted to hijack parts of Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon?
- When Nonie Darwish says: "It is the duty of Muslims to kill Jews according to the Muslim scripture. There are Muslim scriptures that tell u that if you are a Muslim you must kill Jews and if you do not, then you are violating the scriptures." Isn't that considered absurd and hateful?
- Do I need to go attend a lecture by Hitler to know what he will say?
- The Arabs cannot be anit-Semitism since the definition of the word includes Arabs and Hebrews alike.

For your last paragraph, my only comment is this:
youtube . com/watch?v=0meAT6i3iNQ (take out the spaces)

or maybe this is what u r talking about: youtube . com/watch?v=DaiUE-wkE4U (take out the spaces)

Hannah
Mon Nov 24 2008 00:09
Believer of Academia as an open forum for free speech and intellectual education :

I think your name is interesting being that you are a believer of intellectual education, however you are endorsing an author who speaks her opinion as though it were factual and cannot give a citation to back up a single fact presented. To me this is it is intellectual dishonesty, and that is far from being educational. Wanting to build a bridge between Islam, Christianity, and Judaism is a a goal that cannot be achieved by bringing in a speaker that puts Muslim students in a positioned of feeling threatened on their own campus. The University should have seen this, and owe an apology for their negligence.

Debbie Karmel
Sat Nov 22 2008 17:31
As a U.C. student, member of the Chabad student group, and as an Emerson Fellow for the organization Stand With Us, I was an organizer for bringing Nonie Darwish to come speak on campus. I am taking this opportunity, now that so much talk has been generated after her speech, to clear up a few things.

First of all, the following organizations that worked together to bring Ms. Darwish to campus do not endorse any form of hate speech - Stand With Us, Chabad, Zionist Organization of America, and David's Project. The intent of bringing her to campus and of her speech was to inform people about the extremists who have hijacked Muslim society in the Middle East and in addition, to deliver a message of hope. No more do we want people to make associations between Islam and terorrism. After 9/11, the American people had quickly generalized all Muslims in a category of extremism along with the 19 terrorists. That was wrong and Ms. Darwish sent out a message: Do not allow yourselves, as moderate and loving Muslims, to be labeled as the same as those extremists! Stand up and say, terror is not Islam and Islam is not terror! More people should be speaking up this way. The voices of moderate Muslims must be heard! One of her points was to make these distinctions, you must understand this.

Secondly, it is important that people do not judge a person or their views before even hearing them. Many students showed up to the event on Thursday without any prior knowledge about Ms. Darwish; her life story, her publications, or her message. Lots of people talked about the film "Obsession", but that was not the topic of Thursday's talk. How many of the protestors had read her book? How many had ever heard her speak ? Whether you agreed or disagreed with her message, the fair thing to do would have been to come open-minded and to have at least let her finish a sentence before lashing out. Unlike the dictatorships and theocracies of the Muslim world, you, me and Nonie Darwish have the right, in a democarcy such as ours, to speak up without fear of prosecution or death.

It is unfortunate if people were offended by the lecture, but it is vital that people know that legitimate points were made about the extreme anti-Semitism and anti-Western generated around the Middle East (outside of Israel). Hatred towards Jews, Christians, and Westeners is constantly being fostered and legitamized in countries in which the governments openly approve, promote, and encourage it. This cannot be denied. Look at http://www.pmw.org.il if you want proof.

We cannot turn our backs to this anymore, the world can't afford it. When nations are calling for the destruction of other nations in their charters (PLO and Hamas) and other official government documents, we should be concerned! When children are reciting Jihad poetry at 5 years old, we should be concerned! And when global Jihad is reaching the shores beyond the Middle East, we should also be concerned! This is an ideology of hate and of rejection of the unfamiliar and the danger of it is growing quickly. People from all faiths, all cultures, and all ethnicities should be coming together to battle this machine of extreme hate and that was the essential message of Ms. Darwish.

nancy p
Tue Nov 18 2008 14:59
and - to "Nonie Darwish Supporter": Saudi Arabia is one ot the U.S.'s closest allies. Perhaps a better solution to end anti-semitism would be to stop funding it, rather than dehumanizing entire ethnic/religious groups.




Verify you are human: